4 × 4 TB in RAID 6: the numbers
| Usable space | 8 TB (7.3 TB in Windows) |
|---|---|
| Raw space | 16 TB |
| Used for protection | 8 TB |
| Efficiency | 50% |
| Drives that can fail | Any 2 |
| Rebuild at 150 MB/s | 7 h 24 min |
| Rebuild at 50 MB/s (busy) | 22 h |
| Data read during rebuild | 12 TB |
| Read error risk, desktop drives | 62% (corrected) |
| Read error risk, NAS drives | 9.2% (corrected) |
Rebuild
Replacing a failed drive means writing a full 4 TB drive. At 150 MB/s with no other load that takes about 7 h 24 min; on a busy array running at 50 MB/s, about 22 h. The rebuild reads every surviving drive: 12 TB in total.
Read errors
Reading 12 TB, the chance of at least one unreadable sector is 62% with desktop drives (1 per 1014 bits) and 9.2% with NAS drives (1 per 1015). The second parity corrects it, so the rebuild finishes without losing data.
Our take
With four drives, RAID 6 and RAID 10 both give 8 TB. RAID 6 survives any two failures; RAID 10 writes and rebuilds faster. With 4 TB drives, RAID 5 would give 12 TB with a rebuild of 7 h 24 min. RAID 6 is still the safer choice for data you cannot replace.